nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10gig coast to coast
From: Jeff Kell <jeff-kell () utc edu>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:42:00 -0400
On 6/17/2013 10:32 PM, George Herbert wrote:
Also, what are reliability and redundancy requirements. 10 gigs of bare naked fiber is one thing, but if you need extra paths redundancy, figure that out now and specify. Is this latency, bandwidth, both? Mission critical, business critical, less priority? 24x7x365, or subset of that, or intermittent only?
And are you looking for "dark fiber" or can you deal with a lambda? Can you supply tuned optics for the passive mux carriers? Dark coast-to-coast is going to cost you a few appendages. You may land a lambda for a reasonable price depending on the endpoints, you'll need an established carrier with DWDM gear on both ends. Jeff
Current thread:
- 10gig coast to coast eric clark (Jun 17)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 17)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast eric clark (Jun 17)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Carlos Alcantar (Jun 17)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast George Herbert (Jun 17)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Jeff Kell (Jun 17)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Eric Clark (Jun 17)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Phil Fagan (Jun 17)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast eric clark (Jun 17)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Eric Clark (Jun 17)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Jakob Heitz (Jun 18)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Fred Reimer (Jun 18)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Jakob Heitz (Jun 18)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Phil Fagan (Jun 18)
- RE: 10gig coast to coast James Braunegg (Jun 18)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 18)
- RE: 10gig coast to coast James Braunegg (Jun 18)
- Re: 10gig coast to coast Fred Reimer (Jun 18)