nanog mailing list archives
Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:52:58 -0400
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:42:11 -0500, "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." said:
Even the anti-spam army out there seem to ignore 'This is the abusecontact', and end up spamming all whois org contacts. What's the point in that? I agree. Most of them end up blasting all contacts which is completely stupid!!! That's why you see on the comment sections with many providers something along the lines of "Please use Abuse Handle or please send requests for DMCA to this handle"
Well, if the community actually did it's job so mail to abuse@ and postmaster@ and similar role addresses actually got delivered instead of bouncing, and then actually did some good rather than being unread/ignored, maybe we wouldn't have to rely on a DNS jockey listed in a SOA record being pissed off enough at being cc'ed on an abuse mail to get a co-worker's butt in gear. Just sayin'.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads, (continued)
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads Michael Thomas (Jul 26)
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads Warren Bailey (Jul 26)
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 26)
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 26)
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads Barry Shein (Jul 26)
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads Sholes, Joshua (Jul 26)
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 26)
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads John Curran (Jul 26)
- RE: ARIN WHOIS for leads Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Jul 26)
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 26)
- RE: ARIN WHOIS for leads goemon (Jul 26)
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads Rich Kulawiec (Jul 26)
- RE: ARIN WHOIS for leads Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Jul 26)
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads David Conrad (Jul 26)
- Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 26)