RE: Anyone from frontiernet.net on here?

[Janet Sullivan <janets () nairial net>]

Thank you, I really appreciate you looking into this.  In return, I'll offer up that I'm a senior network engineer at 
Microsoft - if you ever have issues with AS8075, ping me, and I'll see what I can do.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Richmond [mailto:jeff.richmond () gmail com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 8:36 PM
To: Warren Bailey
Cc: Janet Sullivan; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Anyone from frontiernet.net on here?

All it looks like I am seeing packet loss there across all of our peering sessions with them, so looks like a problem 
on their network. I'll ask our NOC to open up a ticket with them though just to see if we can find out what the issue 
is.

Thanks,
-Jeff



On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Warren Bailey <wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com> wrote:

> There are some decent sized attacks taking place on gear near London, I believe. Could be a result of that?
>
>
> Sent from my Mobile Device.
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Janet Sullivan <janets () nairial net>
> Date: 07/09/2013 5:01 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Anyone from frontiernet.net on here?
>
>
> I've been seeing really bad packet loss between PCCW and frontier, and so far haven't been able to make any traction 
> with anyone on either side.   I'm betting that the ??? is a peering point either in London or Ashburn.
>
> uk.bgp4.net (0.0.0.0)                        Tue Jul  9 20:39:53 2013
> Keys:  Help   Display mode   Restart statistics   Order of fields   qu
> it                           Packets               Pings
> Host                      Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
> 1. 212.111.33.230          0.0%    43    1.7   0.7   0.5   1.8   0.3
> 2. 212.111.33.237          0.0%    43    2.3   1.9   1.1  22.7   3.3
> 3. 63.218.13.221           0.0%    43    2.3  15.6   1.1 230.3  45.9
> 4. ???
> 5. 74.40.2.173            23.3%    43  177.9 150.3 147.8 177.9   7.0
> 6. 74.40.2.193            20.9%    43  149.9 149.9 149.1 161.2   2.1
> 7. 74.40.3.241            18.6%    43  149.6 152.4 149.1 193.2   8.8
> 8. 74.40.5.49             28.6%    43  148.1 150.8 147.8 192.1   9.9
> 9. 74.40.5.54             26.2%    43  148.3 150.5 147.9 218.7  12.6
> 10. 74.40.5.46             33.3%    42  149.5 154.0 149.2 212.8  14.0
> 11. 74.40.3.137            16.7%    42  147.4 148.7 146.9 163.0   4.1
> 12. 74.40.1.154            29.3%    42  148.2 153.6 147.7 206.7  14.2
> 13. 50.34.2.162            35.7%    42  150.2 150.4 149.8 156.3   1.2
> 14. 50.46.150.55           26.2%    42  150.7 151.0 150.5 152.0   0.4