nanog mailing list archives

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?


From: Jason Baugher <jason () thebaughers com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:17:09 -0600

I can't vouch for these yet, since I haven't used one so far.
http://www.calix.com/systems/p-series/calix_residential_services_gateways.html

It looks to be a Broadband Forum spec, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR-069.
I'm not using it yet either, but find it interesting.




On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Baugher" <jason () thebaughers com>

Calix is producing an Active Ethernet ONT combined with residential
gateway router. I believe it also supports TR-069 for remote management.

I'll check it out.  Thanks.  I assume that's TR-TSY-069, a Telcordia
standard?

One other thing I noticed, most seem to assume a pair of fibers per
device.
Assuming 1G connection, you can easily use bi-directional optics such as
we
use for Active Ethernet and use a single fiber.

Yeah, but the incremental cost of 3-pr drop fiber is likely only to be
maybe 10-15% of the build, and reducing the flexibility is gonna need a
big trade-off for me to buy it; remember, my goal is to allow any prem to
go Layer 1 to wherem ever they want to; they may want both.

(L1 to my other locations, in a ring, and L2 up to a provider from my
hub)

Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink
jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC
2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land
Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647
1274




Current thread: