Re: Will wholesale-only muni actually bring the boys to your yard?

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

On Jan 30, 2013, at 6:24 AM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jean-Francois Mezei" <jfmezei_nanog () vaxination ca>
> >
> > > It is in fact important for a government (municipal, state/privince or
> > > federal) to stay at a last mile layer 2 service with no retail
> > > offering. Wholesale only.
> > >
> > > Not only is the last mile competitively neutral because it is not
> > > involved in retail, but it them invites competition by allowing many
> > > service providers to provide retail services over the last mile
> > > network.
>
> As long as they support open peering they can probably operate at
> layer 3 without harm. Tough to pitch a muni on spending tax revenue
> for something that's not a complete product usable directly by the
> taxpayers.

Perhaps, but well worth the effort. There are a wide variety of reasons
to want more than one L3 provider to be readily available and avoid
limiting consumers to a single choice of ISP policies, capabilities, etc.

Also, an L1/L2 fiber plant may be usable for other services beyond just
packets.

Owen