Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth

[Dave Crocker <dhc2 () dcrocker net>]

On 1/29/2013 7:59 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rob McEwen" <rob () invaluement com>
>
> > (C) The fact that the Internet is a series of PRIVATE networks... NOT
> > owned/operated by the Feds... is a large reason why the 4th amendment
> > provides such protections... it becomes somewhat of a "firewall" of
> > protection against Federal gov't trampling of civil liberties... but
> > if they own the network, then that opens up many doors for them.
>
> Regular readers know that I'm really big on municipally owned fiber networks
> (at layer 1 or 2)... but I'm also a big constitutionalist (on the first,
> second, fourth, and fifth, particularly), and this is the first really good
> counter-argument I've seen, and it honestly hadn't occurred to me.
>
> Rob, anyone, does anyone know if any 4th amendment case law exists on muni-
> owned networks?


The challenge, here, is a classic 'natural monopoly' concern/argument. 
I don't know the right answer, here, but I think the frame for 
discussing it has a long history.

d/

--
 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 bbiw.net