nanog mailing list archives

Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:17:30 +0900

I am so glad that Dutch law enforcement officially confirmed that
logging is not allowed by law because of privacy impact, and that
port tracking is not required.


wow!  is there enough of what they are drinking to be shared widely?

randy

Current thread:

CGN fixed/hashed nat question Eric Oosting (Jan 21)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Nick Hilliard (Jan 21)
  - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Eric Oosting (Jan 21)
- RE: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Dan Wing (Jan 22)
  - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Dobbins, Roland (Jan 22)
    - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Nick Hilliard (Jan 23)
    - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Sander Steffann (Jan 23)
    - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Randy Bush (Jan 23)
    - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Nick Hilliard (Jan 23)
    - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Jean-Francois Mezei (Jan 23)
    - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question William Herrin (Jan 23)
    - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Christian Kratzer (Jan 23)
    - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question William Herrin (Jan 23)
  - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question William Herrin (Jan 23)
    - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Simon Perreault (Jan 23)
    - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question William Herrin (Jan 23)
    - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Simon Perreault (Jan 23)
    - Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question William Herrin (Jan 23)