nanog mailing list archives
Re: CALEA options for small/midsize ISPs
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:58:48 -0600
On 1/20/13, Warren Bailey <wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com> wrote: [snip]
want to play ball, they take what you give with a smile. I would be curious to see what would happen if a lawful intercept request came through and the service provider refused to process it. I have been a
The LEAs might be flexible in how they are willing to take the data. But it would be a very dangerous proposition indeed to outright 'refuse'; I am sure most organizations would be exhausting every reasonable course to satisfy the requirements of the order. Forget about FCC civil penalties: the LEA may start arresting managers responsible for refusal, on the charges of obstruction, due to interfering with an investigation. People might talk about refusing to process a CALEA warrant. IF/when they do receive such a lawful order: I am almost positive they will respond in some way other than a refusal to attempt to comply. So that's probably why it's not likely we will hear of a refusal occuring, at least for a long time
On 1/20/13 8:10 PM, "Justin Wilson" <lists () mtin net> wrote:
[snip] -- -JH
Current thread:
- CALEA options for small/midsize ISPs Byron Hooper (Jan 20)
- Re: CALEA options for small/midsize ISPs Justin Wilson (Jan 20)
- RE: CALEA options for small/midsize ISPs Warren Bailey (Jan 20)
- RE: CALEA options for small/midsize ISPs Frank Bulk (Jan 20)
- Re: CALEA options for small/midsize ISPs Justin Wilson (Jan 20)
- RE: CALEA options for small/midsize ISPs Frank Bulk (Jan 20)
- Re: CALEA options for small/midsize ISPs Justin Wilson (Jan 20)
- Re: CALEA options for small/midsize ISPs Warren Bailey (Jan 20)
- Re: CALEA options for small/midsize ISPs Jimmy Hess (Jan 20)
- Re: CALEA options for small/midsize ISPs Jay Ashworth (Jan 21)
- RE: CALEA options for small/midsize ISPs Frank Bulk (Jan 20)