nanog mailing list archives

Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware


From: Pavel Kislinger <kislinger () kn vutbr cz>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:19:23 +0100

Better IO controller(H700) with his NVcache will make a great job.
Especially if you have more SAS disks and some SSD. For nfdump is much
better a big SAS array build from six or more 900GB SAS HDD in RAID 5
(10k 2.5'' disks are good for this task).

Pavel

On 17.1.2013 17:04, PC wrote:
I agree here with Christopher; A SSD to handle the high IOPS requirements
of real time data logging; combined with a scheduled transfer which can
"move" the stored data in a linear large block copy operation to ordinary
spindles, would be a cost effective hybrid solution.

This of course is assuming the application can handle this separation of
data; and I know nothing about Nfsen


On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Joe Loiacono <jloiacon () csc com> wrote:
Tim Calvin <tcalvin () tlsn net> wrote on 01/16/2013 05:51:11 PM:

PowerEdge R610 -

    2x Intel E5540, 2.53GHz Quad Core Processor

    32GB RAM

    2x 300gb 10k 2.5" SAS HDD
Since netflow processing is generally I/O bound, you may want to invest
in
15K drives.
I had suggested off-list that perhaps primary storage as SSD was a
better path, is there a reason to not do that? (with some larger
storage on spinning-media for historical storage/query).





Current thread: