nanog mailing list archives
Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware
From: PC <paul4004 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:04:33 -0700
I agree here with Christopher; A SSD to handle the high IOPS requirements of real time data logging; combined with a scheduled transfer which can "move" the stored data in a linear large block copy operation to ordinary spindles, would be a cost effective hybrid solution. This of course is assuming the application can handle this separation of data; and I know nothing about Nfsen On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Joe Loiacono <jloiacon () csc com> wrote:Tim Calvin <tcalvin () tlsn net> wrote on 01/16/2013 05:51:11 PM:PowerEdge R610 - 2x Intel E5540, 2.53GHz Quad Core Processor 32GB RAM 2x 300gb 10k 2.5" SAS HDDSince netflow processing is generally I/O bound, you may want to investin15K drives.I had suggested off-list that perhaps primary storage as SSD was a better path, is there a reason to not do that? (with some larger storage on spinning-media for historical storage/query).
Current thread:
- Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware Tim Calvin (Jan 16)
- Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware Joe Loiacono (Jan 17)
- Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware Christopher Morrow (Jan 17)
- Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware PC (Jan 17)
- Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware Pavel Kislinger (Jan 17)
- Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware Joe Loiacono (Jan 17)
- Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware Christopher Morrow (Jan 17)
- Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware Christopher Morrow (Jan 17)
- Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware Joe Loiacono (Jan 17)
- Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware Justin M. Streiner (Jan 17)