nanog mailing list archives
Re: Issues with level3?
From: Warren Bailey <wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:11:08 +0000
Randy beat me.. :/ Class C 192. 0. 0. 0 = 11000000.00000000.00000000.00000000 223.255.255.255 = 11011111.11111111.11111111.11111111 110nnnnn.nnnnnnnn.nnnnnnnn.HHHHHHHH On 1/15/13 10:04 AM, "Randy Carpenter" <rcarpen () network1 net> wrote:
----- Original Message -----On 1/15/13 9:31 AM, Bruce H McIntosh wrote:On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +0000, Warren Bailey wrote:I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lolMore efficient that way - "class c" uses fewer syllables than "slash twenty four" :-)You realize that class-c address space was only found within 192/8 e.g. if you print it in hex, C0000000. so not only is it historically irrelevant but you're using it wrong anyway.But, class B is not B0000000 and A is not A0000000, so is that actually true, or just a coincidence? Class C was actually 192.0.0.0-223.255.255.255 (192.0.0.0/3) -Randy
Current thread:
- Issues with level3? Network Operations (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Warren Bailey (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Bruce H McIntosh (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Warren Bailey (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? joel jaeggli (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Christopher Morrow (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Randy Carpenter (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Warren Bailey (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? joel jaeggli (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Joe Maimon (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Joe Maimon (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Warren Bailey (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Joe Greco (Jan 15)
- RE: Issues with level3? Siegel, David (Jan 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Issues with level3? Scott Weeks (Jan 15)