nanog mailing list archives
Re: Issues with level3?
From: David Miller <dmiller () tiggee com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:37:57 -0500
On 01/15/2013 11:12 AM, Network Operations wrote:
Anyone seeing any issues with level3? We can connect to every other IP in our Class C. When tracerouting to individual IP's, (x.x.x.50/51/52/53) we get a drop at ge-4-16.car2.Washington1.Level3.net [4.59.146.53] for 50, but 51 is fine, drop for 52, 53 is fine. Thanks.
It is not just you. We are seeing issue with that Level3 router/site as well.
I would report it to Level3, but I don't see any need to add to my already extensive collection of one line Level3 support responses saying "All is well. Nothing to see here. All is well."
My guess would be that your up/down for individual IPs is a result of your testing methodology. That Level3 router/site appears to be dropping some packets to all IPs that I tested before dropping my conn there.
Our response to the nearly constant Level3 issues of the past 12/18 months has been terminate them. The washington1.level3 site was unfortunately the last on my list of DCs.
-- -______________________ David Miller dmiller () tiggee com
Current thread:
- Re: Issues with level3?, (continued)
- Re: Issues with level3? Warren Bailey (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? joel jaeggli (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Christopher Morrow (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Randy Carpenter (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Warren Bailey (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? joel jaeggli (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Joe Maimon (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Joe Maimon (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Joe Greco (Jan 15)
- RE: Issues with level3? Siegel, David (Jan 15)