nanog mailing list archives
Re: SDN - Killer Apps
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:10:56 +0200
On (2013-02-25 13:53 +0530), Glen Kent wrote:
I understand that this is just some bit of what we can do with SDN. The amount of what all can be done is limitless. So, a question to all out there - Is my understanding of what can be achieved with SDN, is correct?
Frankly I don't think there is single answer.
From my point of view I don't see much use for it as general purpose SP.
Already second most common reason to outage is software defect, SDN will just reduce software MTBF and can potentially break lot really fast. I don't want to run some HP OV SDNd magic black box process deciding what happens to the network and I don't have the resources (or motivation) to custom develop the software. For researcher it seems really invaluable, you can test new protocols in real equipment. For GOOG/FB et.al. I can also see value, as I imagine their software stack is already very specialized, very home-grown. SDN can allow them to tie in network to their current VM/service orchestration tools, essentially making sure network and services share synchronous view of what should happen. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- SDN - Killer Apps Glen Kent (Feb 25)
- Re: SDN - Killer Apps Simon Perreault (Feb 25)
- Re: SDN - Killer Apps Saku Ytti (Feb 25)
- Re: SDN - Killer Apps Peter Phaal (Feb 25)
- Re: SDN - Killer Apps Jeff Hartley (Feb 25)
- Re: SDN - Killer Apps Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 25)
- Re: SDN - Killer Apps Per Carlson (Feb 25)