nanog mailing list archives

Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth

From: Jason Baugher <jason () thebaughers com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 20:09:44 -0600

On Feb 2, 2013 7:56 PM, "Jay Ashworth" <jra () baylink com> wrote:

....

Well, I would assume the splitters have to be compatible with the OLT/ONT
chosen by a prospective L1 client, no?  Or is GPON GPON, which is GPON?


Splitters are passive. They only split light. They care not what
information the light is carrying.

Current thread:

Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Dave Sparro (Feb 01)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth John R. Levine (Feb 01)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Eric Brunner-Williams (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 02)
  - Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Feb 02)
    - Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jason Baugher (Feb 02)
    - Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Leo Bicknell (Feb 02)
    - Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Scott Helms (Feb 02)
    - Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 03)
    - Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
    - Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 05)
    - Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Feb 05)