Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs

[Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>]

In message <20130221225540.GA99258 () numachi com>, Brian Reichert writes:
> I'm trying to nail down some terminology for doc purposes.
>
> The issue: most resources on the net freely describe a fully-qualified
> domian name ('FQDN') as to exclude the root domain; i.e, they exclude
> the trailing dot as mandated by some RFCs such as RFC 1535:

RFC 1535 is Informational.  It has no status to mandate anything.
 
>   http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1535.txt
>
>     An absolute "rooted" FQDN is of the format {name}{.} A non
>     "rooted" domain name is of the format {name}
>
> I'm trying to come up with some human-facing terminology that names
> these two forms:
>
>       "a.b.c."
>       "a.b.c"
>
> Many resources on the net use the term 'rooted domain name' for the
> former, but they're collectively ambigious about what the other
> form should be called.
>
> Does anyone here have any solid advice, or can point me to a resource
> that would call out useful conventions?
>
> This was all fueled by Microsoft's client code apparently stripping
> the root domain from PTR record results; I'm separately trying to
> track down why that's occuring...

RFC 952 as modified by RFC 1123 describe the legal syntax of a hostname.
There is no trailing period.

> -- 
> Brian Reichert                                <reichert () numachi com>
> BSD admin/developer at large  
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org