nanog mailing list archives
Re: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC
From: Bao Nguyen <ngqbao () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:21:09 -0800
Anyone have worked with the switching vendor Quanta for their 10ge switching as TOR? [1] Their spec looked interesting and they are quiet cheap. [1] http://www.quantaqct.com/en/01_product/02_detail.php?mid=30&sid=114&id=116&qs=63 -bn 0216331C On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
On 12/02/2013 14:23, Piotr wrote:shared 9 MB packet buffer pool that is allocated dynamically to ports that are congested 9MB is a standard size of port buffers..That's pretty standard for a cut-thru ToR switch of this style. Cut-thru switches generally need a lot less packet buffer space than store-n-forward switches. Also, ToR boxes tend not to have complex qos requirements. Having said that, you need to be careful deploying small-buffer boxes. If you're not careful, you will end up with bad packet loss. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC excelsio (Feb 07)
- RE: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC Sergey Marunich (Feb 07)
- Re: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC Piotr (Feb 12)
- Re: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC Nick Hilliard (Feb 12)
- Re: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC Bao Nguyen (Feb 19)
- Re: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC Peter Phaal (Feb 19)
- Re: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC Dan Sneddon (Feb 19)
- Re: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC Piotr (Feb 12)
- RE: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC Sergey Marunich (Feb 07)