nanog mailing list archives

Re: TelePacific a good choice?


From: Mike Hale <eyeronic.design () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:10:05 -0800

I've used them at a previous employer, mainly for PRI termination but
also for some transit and colo services.

They were decent.  Didn't have any major complaints.

If IPv6 is important for you...per what Paul said, they probably
wouldn't be your best choice.  If IPv6 doesn't matter to you, they're
good enough.

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Paul WALL <pauldotwall () gmail com> wrote:
The lack of IPv6 implementation:

http://bgp.he.net/AS14265#_asinfo

should be the only feedback you need.

On 2/19/13, Jeff Harper <jharper () well com> wrote:
Hiya,

We're looking at TelePacific as a possible solution for some of our transit
needs.  If you have an honest experience with them, positive or negative,
I'd like to hear from you.

Simply email me off line with your experiences, thanks!

Jeff Harper, CCIE (W) |  www.well.com
ip access-list extended jeff
permit tcp any any eq intelligence
deny tcp any any eq stupid-people







--
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0


Current thread: