nanog mailing list archives

Re: Will wholesale-only muni actually bring the boys to your yard?


From: Jason Baugher <jason () thebaughers com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:03:43 -0600

For us, it would be the economics of the whole thing. When a 16x19.5 EDFA
runs around $20k, it's much more cost effective to combine 1550nm onto 16
PON's than onto 16 AE runs. Unless the equipment costs were to fall
drastically, there's no way it would ever fly.


On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Frank Bulk (iname.com) <frnkblk () iname com>wrote:

IIRC, there is some issue with bleedover of either the forward or return
(optically modulated) RF wavelength with the data wavelength.  Perhaps with
better lasers this could be overcome in the future.****

** **

Frank****

** **

*From:* Jason Baugher [mailto:jason () thebaughers com]
*Sent:* Friday, February 01, 2013 4:38 PM
*To:* Frank Bulk (iname.com)
*Cc:* Jay Ashworth; NANOG

*Subject:* Re: Will wholesale-only muni actually bring the boys to your
yard?****

** **

Management has asked us why we can't do RF overlay on our AE system. :)
We've had to explain a few times why that would be too expensive even if it
were available because of the high cost of the amps/splitters/combiners to
insert 1550nm onto every AE fiber.****

** **

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Frank Bulk (iname.com) <frnkblk () iname com>
wrote:****

What's missing in this dialogue is the video component of an offering.
 Many customers like a triple (or quad) play because the price points are
reasonable comparable to getting unbundled pricing from more than one
provider, and they have just throat to choke and bill to pay.

But few IP TV providers will claim good profitability.  And I don't
believe any vendor has ActiveE and RFoG going down one strand.

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:jra () baylink com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 8:01 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: Will wholesale-only muni actually bring the boys to your yard?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Francois Mezei" <jfmezei_nanog () vaxination ca>

<snip>

A good layer 2 deployment can support DHCP or PPPoE and thus be
compatible with incumbents infrastructure. However, a good layer2
deployment won't have "RFoG" support and will prefer IPTV over the data
channel (the australian model supports multicast). So cable companies
without IPTV services may be at a disadvantage.

I think this depends on what handoffs my TE can provide at the customer
prem.

In Canada, Rogers (cableco) has announced that they plan to go all
IPTV instead of conventional TV channels.

Well, the MythTV people will be happy to hear that.

Or they would, if the content people would quit holding a gun to the
heads of the transport people.

Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink
jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC
2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land
Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647
1274



****

** **



Current thread: