nanog mailing list archives
Re: Europe-to-US congestion and packet loss on he.net network, and their NOC@ won't even respond
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:19:49 -0800
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Constantine A. Murenin <mureninc () gmail com
wrote:
Dear NANOG@,
...
From hetzner.de through he.net: Cns# date ; mtr --report{,-wide,-cycles=600} --interval 0.1 --order "SRL BGAWV" -4 ????c????????.indiana.edu ; date
Using a 1/10th of a second interval is rather anti-social. I know we rate-limit ICMP traffic down, and such a short interval would be detected as attack traffic, and treated as such. I would take any results you get from such probes with a grain of salt. What results do you get with a more sane interval, one of at least 1 second or more? Matt
Current thread:
- Re: Europe-to-US congestion and packet loss on he.net network, and their NOC@ won't even respond Matthew Petach (Nov 30)
- Re: Europe-to-US congestion and packet loss on he.net network, and their NOC@ won't even respond Constantine A. Murenin (Dec 01)
- Re: Europe-to-US congestion and packet loss on he.net network, and their NOC@ won't even respond sthaug (Dec 01)
- Re: Europe-to-US congestion and packet loss on he.net network, and their NOC@ won't even respond Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: Europe-to-US congestion and packet loss on he.net network, and their NOC@ won't even respond Constantine A. Murenin (Dec 04)
- Re: Europe-to-US congestion and packet loss on he.net network, and their NOC@ won't even respond Rob Seastrom (Dec 01)
- Re: Europe-to-US congestion and packet loss on he.net network, and their NOC@ won't even respond Constantine A. Murenin (Dec 01)