nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 1149
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 08:55:46 -0400
On Apr 1, 2013, at 10:37 PM, George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com> wrote:
Packets, shmackets. I'm just upset that my BGP over Semaphore Towers routing protocol extension hasn't been experimentally validated yet. Whoever you are who keeps flying pigeons between my test towers, you can't deliver packets without proper routing updates! Knock it off long enough for me to converge the #@$#$@ routing table...
I'm working to make our network comply with the latest standards in rfc6919 - Jared
Current thread:
- RFC 1149 Ed Schweitzer (Apr 01)
- Re: RFC 1149 Eric Adler (Apr 01)
- Re: RFC 1149 Jeff Kell (Apr 01)
- Re: RFC 1149 George Herbert (Apr 01)
- Re: RFC 1149 Jared Mauch (Apr 02)
- RE: RFC 1149 Scott Berkman (Apr 02)
- Re: RFC 1149 Owen DeLong (Apr 02)
- Re: RFC 1149 TJ (Apr 02)
- Re: RFC 1149 Jay Ashworth (Apr 02)
- RE: RFC 1149 Jamie Bowden (Apr 03)
- Re: RFC 1149 George Herbert (Apr 03)
- Re: RFC 1149 Jay Ashworth (Apr 03)
- Re: RFC 1149 Måns Nilsson (Apr 04)
- Re: RFC 1149 Randy Bush (Apr 04)
- Re: RFC 1149 Jeff Kell (Apr 01)
- Re: RFC 1149 Eric Adler (Apr 01)
- Re: RFC 1149 Jay Ashworth (Apr 02)