Re: RFC 1149

[Jeff Kell <jeff-kell () utc edu>]

On 4/1/2013 10:15 PM, Eric Adler wrote:
> Make sure you don't miss the QoS implementation of RFC 2549 (and make sure
> that you're ready to implement RFC 6214).  You'll be highly satisfied with
> the results (presuming you and your packets end up in one of the higher
> quality classes).
> I'd also suggest a RFC 2322 compliant DHCP server for devices inside the
> hurricane zone, but modified by implementing zip ties such that the C47s
> aren't released under heavy (wind or water) loads.

Actually, given recent events, I'd emphasize and advocate RFC3514
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3514.txt) which I think is LONG overdue for
adoption.  The implementation would forego most of the currently debated
topics as related to network abuse or misuse :)

Jeff