nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS
From: Yang Yu <yang.yu.list () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:42:49 -0400
If the hosting provider can still charge for IPv4 addresses, why would they support SNI or IPv6 SSL ;) I have seen a CDN using certificates with tons of domain names in subject alternative name. Old Symbian phones don't support SAN...... On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----From: "David Hubbard" <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com>The web server has to support it too, which means compiling apache with SNI support and there are of course plenty of hosts running old apache.Well, sure, but for the hoster, it's a direct benefit, not an externality; they have motive to fix it. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
Current thread:
- IPv6 and HTTPS Jay Ashworth (Apr 25)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Chris Adams (Apr 25)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jay Ashworth (Apr 25)
- RE: IPv6 and HTTPS David Hubbard (Apr 25)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jay Ashworth (Apr 25)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS jeff adams (Apr 25)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Yang Yu (Apr 26)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jay Ashworth (Apr 25)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 25)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Chris Adams (Apr 25)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 25)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS joel jaeggli (Apr 25)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS shawn wilson (Apr 25)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Bernhard Amann (Apr 25)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jima (Apr 26)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS shawn wilson (Apr 26)