nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 19 Sep 2012 21:49:24 -0000
In article <450916D8-FA1D-4D43-BE8F-451D50DD6088 () privaterra org> you write:
Am I correct in assuming that the unused IP block would not be sold as is mentioned in the article, but instead be returned to RIPE to be reallocated?
Since there is no chance of either one happening, no. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Tim Chown (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 John Levine (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 George Herbert (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Seth Mos (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Bacon Zombie (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 George Herbert (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 david peahi (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Robert Guerra (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 George Herbert (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 David Conrad (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Nick Hilliard (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 John Levine (Sep 19)