nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Ignorance
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:14:20 -0700
On Sep 17, 2012, at 12:54 , Eugen Leitl <eugen () leitl org> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:27:04AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:What technology are you planning to deploy that will consume more than 2 addresses per square cm?Easy. Think volume (as in: orbit), and think um^3 for a functional computers ;)
I meant real-world application. Orbits are limited due to the required combination of speed and altitude. There are a limited number of achievable altitudes and collision avoidance also creates interesting problems in time-slotting for orbits which are not geostationary. Geostationary orbits are currently limited to one object per degree of earth surface, and even at 4x that, you could give every satellite a /48 and still not burn through a /32. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Blake Dunlap (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Mark Blackman (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Owen DeLong (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Owen DeLong (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Matthew Kaufman (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Owen DeLong (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Eugen Leitl (Sep 17)
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance Blake Pfankuch (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Owen DeLong (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance joel jaeggli (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Owen DeLong (Sep 17)
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance Beeman, Davis (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Dan Wood (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jason Baugher (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Cutler James R (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jason Baugher (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Cutler James R (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jason Baugher (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Eugen Leitl (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Joe Hamelin (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Cutler James R (Sep 18)