nanog mailing list archives

Re: Big Temporary Networks


From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel () besserwisser org>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:19:28 +0200

Subject: Re: Big Temporary Networks Date: Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 01:11:54PM -0500 Quoting Jimmy Hess (mysidia () gmail 
com):
On 9/15/12, Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote: >
Mans Nilsson wrote:

 >> I am not suggesting that. I'm just trying to point out that there
might be a bunch of assumptions that aren't as true anymore when a
lot of client connections share both source and destination address,
and perhaps also destination port. If this happens simultaneously when
a large amount of other tcp connections are NATed through the same box,
resource starvation will occur.

Assumptions that are already broken in Enterprise networks where 100+
users may share an IP

<snip LONG description of fragile b0rkendeness applied to a perfectly
working network without NAT just so that NAT can be used to break it
even more>

Warum einfach, wenn es auch kompliziert geht? 

-- 
Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
The FALAFEL SANDWICH lands on my HEAD and I become a VEGETARIAN ...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Current thread: