nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv4 address length technical design


From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 20:08:56 -0400 (EDT)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry Shein" <bzs () world std com>

Well, George, you can take a new idea and run with it a bit, or just
resist it right from the start.

We can map from host names to ip addresses to routing actions, right?

So clearly they're not unrelated or independent variables. There's a
smooth function from hostname->ipaddr->routing.

Ah.  *This* is where you fell off the horse. 

Nope; the first one isn't smooth; it's *completely arbitrary*.

The mapping is, in fact, DNS's raison d'etre.

The second one has a relatively smooth mapping *at any given point in time*,
but you can't fit a function to that; it is prone also to arbitrary changes 
over time.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647 1274


Current thread: