nanog mailing list archives
Re: carping about CARP
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:48:48 -0800
On Nov 30, 2012, at 5:08 AM, Henning Brauer <hb-nanog () bsws de> wrote:
and re IANA, they made it clear they would not give us a proto number
As they should have. IANA abides by the rules laid down for it by the IETF/IESG/IAB. The openbsd folks couldn't be bothered to even write up a draft and chose to squat on a protocol number.
no matter what;
BS. If the openbsd folks followed the rules, they'd have gotten the number(s) they requested (assuming they were justified). There is no grand persecution here. There is management of a limited resource.
we didn't have a choice but to ignore that industry-money-driven committee.
Which 'industry-money-driven committee' would that be? Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- carping about CARP Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 29)
- Re: carping about CARP Christopher Morrow (Nov 29)
- Re: carping about CARP Randy Bush (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Stuart Henderson (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Randy Bush (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP David Walker (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Henning Brauer (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP David Conrad (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Doug Barton (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Claudio Jeker (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Andrew Sullivan (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Nick Hilliard (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Christopher Morrow (Nov 29)
- Re: carping about CARP David Walker (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Andrew Sullivan (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Owen DeLong (Nov 30)
- Re: carping about CARP Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 30)