Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

["Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>]

On Nov 20, 2012, at 08:45 , Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

> It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a number
> of reasons.

AMS-IX publishes stats too:
        <https://stats.ams-ix.net/sflow/>

This is probably a better view of overall percentage on the Internet than a specific company's content.  It shows order 
of 0.5%.

Why do you think Google's numbers are lower than the real total?

-- 
TTFN,
patrick


> On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce <aaron.toponce () gmail com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
> > > It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first
> > > time when native IPv6 on google statistics
> > > (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
> > > might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-)
> >
> > And given the rate on that graph, we'll hit 2% before year-end 2013.
> >
> > -- 
> > . o .   o . o   . . o   o . .   . o .
> > . . o   . o o   o . o   . o o   . . o
> > o o o   . o .   . o o   o o .   o o o