Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

6to4 tunnels, no. 6in4 (such as tunnel broker), yes, those are part of the native count.

Owen

On Nov 20, 2012, at 6:57 AM, Oliver Garraux <oliver () g garraux net> wrote:

> So, I assume 6in4 tunnels like HE.net are included in the "native" percentage?
>
> Oliver
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> Oliver Garraux
> Check out my blog:  www.GetSimpliciti.com/blog
> Follow me on Twitter:  twitter.com/olivergarraux
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:02 AM, William F. Maton Sotomayor
> <wmaton () ottix net> wrote:
> > APNIC labs have an interesting set of numbers on IPv6 uptake as well.
> >
> > http://labs.apnic.net/measureipv6/
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Owen DeLong wrote:
> >
> > > It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a
> > > number
> > > of reasons.
> > >
> > > Owen
> > >
> > > On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce <aaron.toponce () gmail com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
> > > > >   It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first
> > > > > time when native IPv6 on google statistics
> > > > > (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
> > > > > might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And given the rate on that graph, we'll hit 2% before year-end 2013.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > . o .   o . o   . . o   o . .   . o .
> > > > . . o   . o o   o . o   . o o   . . o
> > > > o o o   . o .   . o o   o o .   o o o
> >
> > wfms