nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 12:18:32 -0700
Anurag, On May 28, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
I know few registry/registrars which do not accept both (or all) name servers of domain name on same subnet. They demand at least 1 DNS server should be on different subnet for failover reasons (old thoughts).
IMHO appropriately so. The fact that anycast allows for multiple (potentially) geographically distributed machines to respond to DNS queries does not remove the value of having multiple prefixes for DNS servers. Single points of failure are generally bad. Imagine the scenario where someone makes a booboo and accidentally filters your single anycast prefix... Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Anurag Bhatia (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies David Conrad (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Tony Finch (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Anurag Bhatia (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Patrick W. Gilmore (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Anurag Bhatia (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Randy Bush (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Anurag Bhatia (May 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Brett Frankenberger (May 28)