nanog mailing list archives
Re: isc - a good business
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 20:52:07 +0900
fwiw, i think isc and isc staff are very well intentioned and do a lot of good work for the community. i have doubts about isc's business model, but definitely not that it makes too much money or is greedy. maybe a bit too much layer ten for my taste. and i run and appreciate the software. randy
Current thread:
- isc - a good business paul vixie (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Randy Bush (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business paul vixie (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Jay Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business George Herbert (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Paul Vixie (May 28)
- NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Jay Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Jay Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. bmanning (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business paul vixie (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Randy Bush (May 28)