Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links)

[Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>]

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Douglas Otis <dotis () mail-abuse org> wrote:
> The Internet should use more than port 80 and port 443.  Is extending
> entrenched TCP cruft really taking the Internet to a better and safer
> place?

isn't the 'internet should use more than 80/443' really: "Some
compelling use case should be found for more than 2 ports" ? Or
perhaps more clearly: "What application is written that is getting
wide appeal and uses more than 80/443?"

(aside from edonkey which Arbor always shows as a huge user of bandwidth)

-chris
(btw, it would be nice to use more ports, if there are applications
and users of said applications that want to do that...)