nanog mailing list archives
Re: LX sfp minimum range
From: Pierre-Yves Maunier <nanog () maunier org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:47:27 +0100
2012/1/27 Steven Tardy <sjt5 () its msstate edu>
On 01/26/12 16:33, Pierre-Yves Maunier wrote:It can happends that SX works on singlemode but it can fail anytime. just because you can doesn't mean you should.we have experience multiple cases where LX-MMF-LX works great for 3-5+ years... then one day no longer gets link. swapping to a different fiber pair restores link. can't remember SX-MMF-SX failing after years of service.
That's why I wrote 'but it can fail anytime' meaning, I strongly recommand to NOT do it. -- Pierre-Yves Maunier
Current thread:
- Re: LX sfp minimum range, (continued)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range David Storandt (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Pierre-Yves Maunier (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Jon Heise (Jan 26)
- RE: LX sfp minimum range Holmes,David A (Jan 26)
- Message not available
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Pierre-Yves Maunier (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range David Storandt (Jan 26)
- RE: LX sfp minimum range George Bonser (Jan 26)
- Message not available
- RE: LX sfp minimum range George Bonser (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Pierre-Yves Maunier (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range PC (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Steven Tardy (Jan 27)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Pierre-Yves Maunier (Jan 27)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Tom Storey (Jan 29)
- Message not available
- RE: LX sfp minimum range George Bonser (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Gary Buhrmaster (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Wayne E Bouchard (Jan 26)