nanog mailing list archives
Re: LX sfp minimum range
From: Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:27:17 +0500
Theoretically speaking Yes there should be an issue while using the LX SFP for short range because it may damage the receiver part. But we've been using it for quite a long time within datacenter for rack to rack switch connectivity without harming the SFP or the performance. Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Tim Durack <tdurack () gmail com> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:26 PM, jon Heise <jon () smugmug com> wrote:we are moving a router between 2 data centers and we only have LX sfp'sfor connection, is there any issue using LX sfp's in a short range deployment ? A Cisco 1000BASE-LX optic has the following spec: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps5455/ps6577/product_data_sheet0900aecd8033f885.html -3dBm maximum transmit power, -3dBm maximum receive. That means you can run it over any length. (We use LX for everything.) -- Tim:>
Current thread:
- LX sfp minimum range jon Heise (Jan 25)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Tim Durack (Jan 25)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Aftab Siddiqui (Jan 25)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Andrew D Kirch (Jan 25)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Aftab Siddiqui (Jan 25)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Joel jaeggli (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range David Storandt (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Pierre-Yves Maunier (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Jon Heise (Jan 26)
- RE: LX sfp minimum range Holmes,David A (Jan 26)
- Message not available
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Pierre-Yves Maunier (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range David Storandt (Jan 26)
- RE: LX sfp minimum range George Bonser (Jan 26)
- Message not available
- RE: LX sfp minimum range George Bonser (Jan 26)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Tim Durack (Jan 25)
- Re: LX sfp minimum range Pierre-Yves Maunier (Jan 26)