nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?)
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:02:56 -1000
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org> wrote:
On 2012-01-26 02:21 , William Herrin wrote:Should their packets ever leak on to the public Internet, the ULA users want them to fail.If one does not want packets to get to the Internet then don't connect it to the Internet.
Jeroen, I once worked with an otherwise brilliant gentleman who in his rigid mindset earnestly believed that the correct solution to contingency planning was: don't make mistakes. He gave notice when he figured out that hiring me was the owner's contingency plan. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside comĀ bill () herrin us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
Current thread:
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?, (continued)
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Message not available
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Tim Chown (Jan 26)
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 26)
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 31)
- "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?) Jeroen Massar (Jan 25)
- Re: "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?) William Herrin (Jan 25)
- Re: "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?) Jeroen Massar (Jan 25)
- Re: "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?) William Herrin (Jan 25)
- Re: "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?) Jeroen Massar (Jan 25)
- Re: "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?) William Herrin (Jan 25)