nanog mailing list archives
Re: Linux Centralized Administration
From: Nickola Kolev <nikky () mnet bg>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:22:31 +0200
Hello, On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:42:30 -0500 (EST) Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Daniel Ankers wrote:I looked into Puppet and though I've got it managing parts of our infrastructure it seems quite difficult to bolt on to an existing setup. There are also some things that I can't see how to do easily with Puppet ("Don't upgrade packages on the live environment until we've tested them in staging" being a big one.)Has anyone mentioned cluster ssh yet? Depending on your scale, cluster ssh and a "really big screen" may be a suitable way to manage N servers and do things like apply updates or make identical changes to all at once (or in groups). It also gives you the flexibility to apply commands to all or single out a system and do things just in the one window, then to back to talking to all.
Continuing that line of tools, I'm using parallel-ssh (http://code.google.com/p/parallel-ssh/) with great success for managing several hundred servers, spread all over the world. -- Best regards, Nickola Kolev
Current thread:
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration, (continued)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Blake Dunlap (Jan 12)
- Message not available
- RE: Linux Centralized Administration Paul Stewart (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Matthew Palmer (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration John Adams (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Jimmy Hess (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration chaim.rieger () gmail com (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Paul Graydon (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Paul Graydon (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Daniel Ankers (Jan 13)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Jon Lewis (Jan 13)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Nickola Kolev (Jan 13)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration chaim.rieger () gmail com (Jan 12)