nanog mailing list archives

Re: X.509 Certs For Personal Use


From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl () asgaard org>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:04:21 -0800

Greetings I'll +1 Chris's experience with startssl

On 18Feb2012, at 10.57, Christopher Morrow wrote:

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:44 AM, John Peach <john-nanog () johnpeach com> wrote:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:27:05 +0100
Phil Regnauld <regnauld () nsrc org> wrote:

toor (lists) writes:
I use http://www.startssl.com/ for all my personal certifcates. I have
not had any issues with the validations (once you have an account you
can validate a domain by sending an email to a predefined list of
contact addresses) and the certificates are issued instantly.

      "Your request is being held up for review by our personnel".

      Up to 6 hours. Must be their definition of instant :)

It's nice to see that they actually do random reviews, rather than just
issuing everything requested. I use startssl and have not had anything
held for review.

I've had most of mine held, but almost always I get a response in side
of 20 mins. Really, what I care about here is:
 1) cert validates in almost all clients (mozilla/chrome/mail.app)
 2) controlled/secured by my key, not something made up on the server side
 3) not paying money for random bytes.

it works and eddy's pretty quick on requests.

-chris


      Cheers,
      Phil



--
John



--  
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc
Current vCard here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.vcf

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Current thread: