nanog mailing list archives

Re: X.509 Certs For Personal Use


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:57:25 -0500

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:44 AM, John Peach <john-nanog () johnpeach com> wrote:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:27:05 +0100
Phil Regnauld <regnauld () nsrc org> wrote:

toor (lists) writes:
I use http://www.startssl.com/ for all my personal certifcates. I have
not had any issues with the validations (once you have an account you
can validate a domain by sending an email to a predefined list of
contact addresses) and the certificates are issued instantly.

      "Your request is being held up for review by our personnel".

      Up to 6 hours. Must be their definition of instant :)

It's nice to see that they actually do random reviews, rather than just
issuing everything requested. I use startssl and have not had anything
held for review.

I've had most of mine held, but almost always I get a response in side
of 20 mins. Really, what I care about here is:
  1) cert validates in almost all clients (mozilla/chrome/mail.app)
  2) controlled/secured by my key, not something made up on the server side
  3) not paying money for random bytes.

it works and eddy's pretty quick on requests.

-chris


      Cheers,
      Phil



--
John



Current thread: