nanog mailing list archives
Re: time sink 42
From: Joel M Snyder <Joel.Snyder () Opus1 COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:32:07 -0700
On 2/16/12 2:23 PM, nanog-request () nanog org wrote:
time sink 42
Others have already noted the difference between TZ and M tapes; the TZ tapes are also supposed to be 'better' in that they are laminated, while the M tapes are not and may decay more quickly.
However, the problem I have is that the "better" label maker (the one that takes TZ tapes) is not nearly as easy to use as the "cheaper" one, the M-compatible P-touch. I knew that I didn't want a bunch of useless features, so I bought the cheapest TZ-compatible P-touch I could find, the 1290, but it is about twice as hard to get anything done with it as the bottom-of-the-line $19.95 P-Touch that takes M tapes.
Anyone got a solution for *that* particular problem? Should I get a better TZ-compatible labeler?
jms -- Joel M Snyder, 1404 East Lind Road, Tucson, AZ, 85719 Senior Partner, Opus One Phone: +1 520 324 0494 jms () Opus1 COM http://www.opus1.com/jms
Current thread:
- Re: time sink 42, (continued)
- Re: time sink 42 Jerry Jones (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Aled Morris (Feb 16)
- Which way to fold the label (was: Re: time sink 42) Jay Ashworth (Feb 17)
- Re: Which way to fold the label (was: Re: time sink 42) Karl Auer (Feb 17)
- Re: time sink 42 Owen DeLong (Feb 16)
- RE: time sink 42 Nathan Eisenberg (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Leo Bicknell (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 harold barker (Feb 16)
- Which P-Touch should I have? Jay Ashworth (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? Owen DeLong (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? William Herrin (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? Joe Hamelin (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? Owen DeLong (Feb 16)
- RE: Which P-Touch should I have? Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? Joe Hamelin (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? Måns Nilsson (Feb 17)