Re: Common operational misconceptions

[Paul Thornton <prt () prt org>]

On 16/02/2012 07:45, Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>
> > On 2012.02.15 19:55, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
> > > > IPv6 is operational.
> > >
> > > How is this a misconception?  It works fine for me...
> >
> > Imagine an operator who is v6 ignorant, with a home provider who implements v6 half-assed, and tries to access a v6 
> > site that has perhaps v6-only accessible nameservers, when their provider who 'offers' v6 has resolvers that operate 
> > only over v4.
> >
> > *huge* misconception about the operational status of IPv6 (imho).
> >
> > Steve
>
> By that definition, IPv4 is non-operational.
>
> You can break anything if you try hard enough.

This being well demonstrated by most of the "Internet" access provided
by hotels, for example.

-- 
Paul