nanog mailing list archives
Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack
From: bas <kilobit () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:03:19 +0100
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:56 AM, George Bonser <gbonser () seven com> wrote:
I'll put it another way. Any provider that does not police their customer traffic has no business whining about DoS problems.
Most of us prevent their customers from sending out spoofed traffic. 77% of all networks seem to think so. http://spoofer.csail.mit.edu/summary.php However the remaining networks allow spoofed traffic to egress their networks. When that traffic enters my network, I have no method whatsoever to differentiate it from any other traffic. I could ask my upstream where they see it coming from, which will be quite hard if they do not have pretty fancy systems. But if they receive it from a peer, I am as good as lost in trying to find the culprit. Bas
Current thread:
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack, (continued)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Dobbins, Roland (Feb 05)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Keegan Holley (Feb 05)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Dobbins, Roland (Feb 05)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack bas (Feb 07)
- RE: UDP port 80 DDoS attack George Bonser (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Keegan Holley (Feb 08)
- RE: UDP port 80 DDoS attack George Bonser (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Keegan Holley (Feb 08)
- RE: UDP port 80 DDoS attack George Bonser (Feb 08)
- RE: UDP port 80 DDoS attack George Bonser (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack bas (Feb 08)
- RE: UDP port 80 DDoS attack George Bonser (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Keegan Holley (Feb 08)
- RE: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Drew Weaver (Feb 08)
- RE: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Feb 09)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Steve Bertrand (Feb 09)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Keegan Holley (Feb 09)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Keegan Holley (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Christopher Morrow (Feb 08)
- RE: UDP port 80 DDoS attack George Bonser (Feb 08)
- Re: UDP port 80 DDoS attack Mark Andrews (Feb 08)