nanog mailing list archives
Re: JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP
From: Tom Paseka <tom () cloudflare com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:22:21 -0800
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
I would push back for a slightly different reason... Any inability to forward IPv6 might not impact the IPv4 peering session and you might run into a situation where the peering session stays up and continues exchanging routes, but the traffic cannot pass (or cannot pass in one direction which is even more fun to diagnose). Owen
The OP mentioned this was just for Akamai (for their DNS mapping). BGP isn't used for forwarding path.
Current thread:
- JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP Pete Ashdown (Dec 21)
- Re: JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP harbor235 (Dec 21)
- Re: JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP Owen DeLong (Dec 21)
- Re: JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP Tom Paseka (Dec 21)
- Re: JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP Owen DeLong (Dec 21)
- Re: JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP Cody Rose (Dec 21)
- Re: JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP Jared Mauch (Dec 21)
- Re: JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP Pete Ashdown (Dec 21)
- Re: JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP Leo Bicknell (Dec 21)
- Re: JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP David Swafford (Dec 21)
- Re: JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP Tom Paseka (Dec 21)
- Re: JunOS IPv6 announcements over IPv4 BGP harbor235 (Dec 21)