nanog mailing list archives
Re: MTU mismatch on one link
From: Ben Bartsch <uwcableguy () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:13:41 -0500
mturoute.exe works great http://www.elifulkerson.com/projects/mturoute.php On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Justin M. Streiner <streiner () cluebyfour org
wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Andrew K. wrote: Besides routing protocol convergence is there any service issues withrunning mismatched MTU? Assuming the packet flow does not exceed the smallest MTU value.Not really, but given the bursty nature of IP traffic, that's a very dubious assumption. In other words, you _can_ do it, but it's not a good idea, and can end up making lots of extra headaches for you/whoever supports this setup. jms
Current thread:
- MTU mismatch on one link Tom Taylor (Aug 31)
- RE: MTU mismatch on one link Paul Vinciguerra (Aug 31)
- Re: MTU mismatch on one link Mike A (Aug 31)
- Re: MTU mismatch on one link Justin M. Streiner (Aug 31)
- RE: MTU mismatch on one link Blake Pfankuch (Aug 31)
- Re: MTU mismatch on one link Dan White (Aug 31)
- Re: MTU mismatch on one link Andrew K. (Aug 31)
- Re: MTU mismatch on one link Justin M. Streiner (Aug 31)
- Re: MTU mismatch on one link Ben Bartsch (Aug 31)
- Re: MTU mismatch on one link Tom Taylor (Aug 31)
- Re: MTU mismatch on one link Andrew K. (Aug 31)
- Re: MTU mismatch on one link Tom Taylor (Aug 31)
- Re: MTU mismatch on one link Scott Helms (Aug 31)
- RE: MTU mismatch on one link Paul Vinciguerra (Aug 31)