nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited
From: Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin () exa-networks co uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:44:02 +0100
Fell free to contact me if you have any questions about ExaBGP as I am painfully aware it's documentation is nowhere near what it should be. Thomas Sent from my iPad On 23 Aug 2012, at 08:52, Andy Davidson <andy () nosignal org> wrote:
On 22 Aug 2012, at 18:42, David Hubbard <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com> wrote:Of those who have used Quagga or Bird, or anything else, would either of them be appropriate and/or well suited for use as an iBGP blackhole route server?You can use Quagga or Bird as a blackhole BGP injector, because the forwarding load is next to nothing and the number of prefixes in your blackhole RIB is likely to be small. You might - if you programatically get the blackhole criteria from your crm or some other database find ExaBGP to be easier to integrate with your data source. ExaBGP is a very lightweight BGP speaker that is perfectly suited for this purpose - http://code.google.com/p/exabgp/ Andy
Current thread:
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited, (continued)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Walter Keen (Aug 28)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Edward J. Dore (Aug 29)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Eduardo Schoedler (Aug 29)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Laurent GUERBY (Aug 31)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Dan Shechter (Aug 31)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Eduardo Schoedler (Aug 31)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Edward Dore (Aug 31)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Andrew Latham (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Andy Davidson (Aug 23)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Thomas Mangin (Aug 23)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Christopher Morrow (Aug 24)