nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS Changer items
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:02:06 +0900
However, for network sanitation purposes, I'll admit some surprise that the DNSchanger blocks have been reused so quickly.
i conject sets a precedent for quick grab and sell, well rent. those dnschanger folk were bad guys, so no one should have sympathy for them. first they came for ... [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came%E2%80%A6] second, well, let's throw some really bad stuff in the pot and see what happens. we're used to the vendors doing testing on operators, so why not rirs doing the same. actually, i am surprised that geoff and ggm have not asked for some so they can measure. randy
Current thread:
- Re: DNS Changer items Stephen Wilcox (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Grant Ridder (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Grant Ridder (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Grant Ridder (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Nick Hilliard (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Nick Hilliard (Aug 16)
- Re: DNS Changer items David Conrad (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Grant Ridder (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Barry Greene (Aug 16)
- Re: DNS Changer items joel jaeggli (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Leo Bicknell (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items joel jaeggli (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Whitney (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items valdis . kletnieks (Aug 15)