nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS Changer items
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:34:08 -0400
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:51:32 -0400, Randy Whitney said:
Perhaps it should not have been re-allocated at all, rather than cause the unsuspecting allocatee trouble they would not have seen from clean(er) space.
"unsuspecting"??!? You want a clean prefix, get some IPv6 space instead. Anybody who is getting IPv4 space in 2012 and doesn't realize that they're getting "scraping the bottom of the barrel" quality prefixes will get what they deserve for not doing their due diligence (i.e. paying attention the last decade or so).
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: DNS Changer items, (continued)
- Re: DNS Changer items Nick Hilliard (Aug 16)
- Re: DNS Changer items David Conrad (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Barry Greene (Aug 16)
- Re: DNS Changer items Leo Bicknell (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items joel jaeggli (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Leo Bicknell (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items joel jaeggli (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items joel jaeggli (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items TJ (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items Randy Whitney (Aug 15)
- Re: DNS Changer items valdis . kletnieks (Aug 15)