nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS?!
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:48:11 -0400
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 07:31:47 -0400, Drew Weaver said:
That's just not true, we would much rather be notified of something that a reputation list finds objectionable and take it down ourselves than have Senderbase set a poor reputation on dozens of IaaS customers.
If it was industry-wide standard practice that just notifying a provider resulted in something being done, we'd not need things like Senderbase, which is after all basically a list of people who don't take action when notified...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS?!, (continued)
- Re: SORBS?! Landon Stewart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Sam Oduor (Apr 05)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 05)
- RE: SORBS?! goemon (Apr 05)
- Re: SORBS?! Landon Stewart (Apr 05)
- Re: SORBS?! Jon Lewis (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Nick Hilliard (Apr 05)
- Re: SORBS?! PC (Apr 05)
- Re: SORBS?! Brett Frankenberger (Apr 06)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 05)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jimmy Hess (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Robert Bonomi (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! William Herrin (Apr 06)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! William Herrin (Apr 06)