nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:41:17 -0400
On Apr 11, 2012, at 5:19 PM, PC wrote:
He.net tunnels are also good to have because depending on your provider, there's still many with incomplete views of the ipv6 routing table and he might have a path. This is a more prevalent issue with ipv6 than v4 at the moment.
This is a big problem for the two providers involved in this "spat" having inconsistent IPv4/IPv6 business relationships (peering, etc). There are many professional service providers that will happily dual-stack your internet port with consistent business relationships. Don't let these two parties that so far have agreed to disagree prevent you from using IPv6 to its fullest. Select another carrier. - Jared
Current thread:
- IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE Anurag Bhatia (Apr 11)
- Re: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE Dan Sneddon (Apr 11)
- RE: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE Rampley Jr, Jim F (Apr 11)
- Re: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE Seth Mos (Apr 11)
- Re: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE Anurag Bhatia (Apr 11)
- Re: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE PC (Apr 11)
- Re: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE Jared Mauch (Apr 11)
- Re: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE William Herrin (Apr 11)
- Re: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE Jared Mauch (Apr 11)
- Re: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE Anurag Bhatia (Apr 11)
- Re: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE Owen DeLong (Apr 11)