Re: IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE

[Dan Sneddon <dxs () twitter com>]

Hurricane Electric have a presentation on testing their tunnels using Traceroute6, Tracepath6, and mtr:
http://ipv6.he.net/presentations/trace6.pdf

iperf now supports IPv6 and works well for testing tunnels as well.  

I have previously gotten good results from Hurricane Electric tunnels. 

--
Dan Sneddon
Network Engineering & Network Security
twitter | AS13414
dxs () twitter com | Follow me! @dansneddon


On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> Does anyone here has clues on IPv6 support via Charter? We recently got BGP
> up on the connection and they denied for IPv6 support for now. Support
> engineer gave expected time of something like end of year which seems very
> late as per our plans.
>
>
> Is situation same for everyone who sits in downstream of Charter?
>
>
> Also, does it makes sense to go for BGP Tunnel for now? I just setup IPv6
> Tunnel via Hurricane Electric. Latency seems pretty much OK ~ 10-15ms of
> overhead. Yet to test other parameters. I heard Tunnels are usually bad.
> Can someone tell how to test this tunnel setup to confirm if there is a
> performance issue or not? I am thinking of writing a quick bash script and
> run via cron to test latency, packet loss and bandwidth throughput for
> couple of days. If anyone has better idea, please let me know.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- 
>
> Anurag Bhatia
> anuragbhatia.com
> or simply - http://[2001:470:26:78f::5] if you are on IPv6 connected
> network!
>
> Twitter: @anurag_bhatia <https://twitter.com/#!/anurag_bhatia>
> Linkedin: http://linkedin.anuragbhatia.com