RE: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building a nationwide network

[Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnkblk () iname com]
> Sent: 18 September 2011 23:14
> To: 'Charles N Wyble'; nanog () nanog org
> Subject: RE: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on
> building a nationwide network
>
> Where I live in rural America, I would not be surprised that someone
> who wanted to start an ISP might only be able to cost-justify one
> upstream.  When one Internet T-1 is $1,200/month, getting a second T-1
> for that price from another provider just to get an AS or PI is
> definitely cost-prohibitive and may go against their business plan.
>
> Our own company has just one upstream provider (from geographically
> diverse POPs), our state's telecom coop, and to multi-home solely to
> meet ARIN's policy doesn't make sense.  Fortunately we were using
> enough address space to meet the /20 requirement.
>
> Charles, if you wrote a policy that allowed smaller ISPs to obtain a PI
> without the multihoming requirement if they demonstrated that
> multihoming was burdensome, I would support it at arin-ppml.
>
> Frank

I'll happily 'multihome' anybody over a GRE tunnel if it helps ;-)

--
Leigh



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________